ICAN, in partnership with the Permanent Missions of Norway, Sweden, and Canada, the United Kingdom Foreign Commonwealth & Development Office (UKFCDO), the Ministry of Gender, Child and Welfare of South Sudan, the Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict (GPPAC), and the National Transformational Leadership Institute (NTLI), convened a 1.5-day workshop to discuss how to strengthen community security as a localized, transformative approach for sustainable peace.
5 Ways We Can Defend Women’s Rights and Muslim Rights
On January 22, many of the women I know across the Muslim world stood with U.S. women. Some stood in spirit as the Women’s March movement crossed the globe. Some held their own marches, sending messages of solidarity. Many expressed hope that the American women’s movement would take a progressive stance with respect to U.S. foreign policy and U.S. relations with the Islamic world. They wished for less aggression and conflict in the region, and an end to the demonization of Muslims.
The reality is that the majority of Muslims around the globe view the current debate on Islam in the West as problematic. For those who are working to promote rights, the current debate especially hinders their efforts.
On the right, discourse tends to demonize Islam, equating all Muslims with extremist groups such as ISIS and Islam with what ISIS and other extremists espouse—a notion which Muslims around the world, despite varied approaches and interpretations to their faith, adamantly reject. In so doing, those on the right dismiss the differences of Muslims, reducing their identities only to their faith and a version of that faith most Muslims reject. The conservative right in the West fails to recognize that extremists manipulate religion and elements in culture for power and political gains, and that what they preach is a distorted ideology that has little to do with how the majority of peaceful Muslims practice their religion and have lived for centuries.
On the other hand, in an effort to stop this demonization, a discourse has emerged among progressive leftists which almost entirely opposes any criticism of the faith and practice of Muslims. These groups often stifle constructive and legitimate criticism—and are seen by some as apologists for those who may use the religion to justify rights violations or ensure their own power.
The reality is that in most Muslim contexts, there are vibrant movements, even if at times small, which have reformist and even critical perspectives toward the traditional practice of the faith. They question the cultural beliefs and practices attributed to the faith. Many are working for the adoption of secular or civic law, in an effort to promote rights and democracy. In fact, citizens in Muslim contexts while being the most vulnerable to the violence of extremist groups like ISIS are and have for long been engaged in debate and reform, a point exemplified in the varied approaches of each culture, country or sect. It is fair to say that the beliefs of Muslims are anything but static and by no means monoliths.
For those of us who have worked to promote women’s rights in Muslim Majority contexts in the Middle East, North Africa and Asia, the connections between East and West are clear and particularly complicated. We fully understand that women’s rights is a politically charged issue in both contexts, used to illustrate ideological points held by groups on each end of the spectrum.
Therefore, speaking up as a Muslim woman in the West—particularly in the politically charged context of the U.S.—is extremely complicated and difficult. You are expected to represent all Muslims; whatever you say is weighed and seen as a statement on Muslim women’s rights across the globe. Caught in a largely static dichotomy of black and white and tangled in a discourse of extremes pitting notions of oppressor and liberator against one another, many fall into the trap of bolstering efforts of Islamophobes or serving to justify or apologize for Islamist ideologies that repress women.
The times ahead are going to pose more challenges for women of Muslim heritage in the U.S. as they try to balance their ethnic, religious and gender identities—at a time when those from Muslim backgrounds are being vehemently targeted and demonized.
How do you speak up against the backlash targeting Muslims while still advocating for women’s rights? How do women from Muslim heritage speak up without emboldening or strengthening either of the extremes, which at their core objectify women to serve their own political ends? I am not sure if I have all the answers—but these five lessons I have learned from advocating women’s rights in Muslim contexts at the intersection of East and West may be a good start.
#1: Defend universal rights and personal choice.
As Muslim women or women from Muslim heritage aligning ourselves with women’s movements in the West, we need to also stand steadfastly for universal rights of women living in Muslim contexts.
We need to defend their personal rights and choices—even if they go against custom, culture and tradition. This includes speaking up against issues such as forced marriage, forced dress codes and efforts to limit women’s presence in the social and political spheres, including restrictions on women’s right to drive. As we work to bring light to positive aspects of Islam or Muslim countries, we need to also speak up against force and violence targeting women and the violation of human rights, especially when it is being done in the name of religion and culture.
We should defend rights as forcefully as when we speak up against those who want to wage war against Muslims or their countries, those who demonize Muslims or promote discrimination against them in the West. If we set universal rights as our starting point, we will always condemn actions by state and non-state actors which take away women’s choice, whether it be in the West or in the East.
#2: Understand your audience—and larger political contexts.
We have to understand the political context in which we speak but still be true to our own values. For this reason, we cannot use single issues to drive home our point.
Single issues—or the flattening of the issues to the point that they fail to reflect even the most basic of complexities—is an approach that feeds into the extreme narratives on both sides. For example, the condemnation of forced hijabs in some Muslim countries presented as a single issue may bolster the argument by some in the West who are in favor of war. They often use this issue to demonize their opponent and justify harsh action, cloaked in an effort to liberate women. At the same time, tunnel vision defense of forced veiling, dismissal of it as a problem or its attribution to cultural norms may bolster Islamists in their effort to push back on women’s rights and its advocates.
These are tricky and politically charged contexts and times—and we have to be able to speak to multiple audiences and multiple issues at the same time.
#3: Adopt a nuanced, more complex third discourse when discussing Islam and Muslims.
Recognize that the dichotomous narrative of opposing extremes—supporting Islamophobes on the one hand and Islamists on the other—is hard to change. Working to create spaces in the middle and alternative discourses, which paint a more complex and nuanced picture of realities with respect to Islam and Muslims, is difficult. Anyone who ventures to do so will be questioned and attacked by single-issue adherents on each end of the spectrum, most possibly simultaneously. It will be tough for sure, but it will hopefully work to widen the space of discourse and to offer a more complex picture of the issues at hand.
At the same time, we need to create a chorus of different voices—each offering a third narrative of their own. Not all of what we have to say will be the same, but much of what we say will be—especially if we adhere to universal rights. In this diversity we will build a wide alternative space for discourse and discussion that will bring with it the opportunity to understand the complexities of the global and local issues we face.
#4: Talk, talk, talk it out!
Women activists of Muslim heritage in the West and women living in Muslim contexts in the East need to interact and learn more from one another. They need to understand one another’s contexts better and work collectively to identify the best strategies to address and prevent the violation of women’s rights as well as rights of Muslims and other minorities.
In the first instance, I would recommend that this discussion take place between those who do see the issues as complex, that are not tied to single issue advocacy and who do not fall on either end of the extremes. We have to recognize that this is a process of growth, both personal growth and collective growth and maturation—so we have to be patient and open to hearing one another.
#5: Celebrate our diversity and multiple identities.
Extremists on both sides benefit from eliminating or demonizing diversity and difference.
For many, the worst thing resulting from the current dominant discourses on the right and the left is the elimination of difference and what makes us unique. They reduce all of us from Muslim heritage to one single identity—our religious one. But we know that we are different and have multiple identities at the same time.
Let us recognize them, celebrate them and value them—whether we are secular women from Muslim heritage, practicing Muslim women who observe the hijab or Atheists; whether we are Sunni, or Shia; first generation from Palestine or third generation originally from Iran; whether we are immigrants, refugees, students or professionals.
Let us recognize and celebrate our differences—and be unified by them.
Related Posts
ICAN's Senior Program Officer, Rosalie Fransen provides a gendered analysis of emerging trends and threats in the CT and P/CVE landscape.
Commentaries G&E other resources ICAN UpdatesFollowing the Taliban takeover, a large number of civil-society leaders, particularly women, were forced to flee the country, and a severe lack of funding and a repressive operating environment led many organizations to shut their doors.
Commentaries Exclude from RSS ICAN UpdatesTo prevent the forever war turning into war forever, instead of an arms race and trillion-dollar defense spending, now more than ever we need to stand for and practice the principles of universal human rights, justice, and pluralism.
Commentaries ICAN Latest ICAN Updates Sanam Op-EdsAfghanistan's country code is +93. My phone lights up—day and night. I cannot bear to answer, knowing I have no answers. I cannot bear to ignore them. "I hope you are not tired," they say. "Sorry to bother you," "Thank you for thinking of us," and "If they find me, they'll rip me apart, please take my children." Their graciousness, dignity, apologies for disturbing our lives, to help save theirs, are humbling and haunting.
Commentaries ICAN Featured ICAN Latest ICAN Updates Sanam Op-EdsAn op-ed by Sanam Naraghi Anderlini about the gendered impact of COVID-19, and the relevance of the WPS agenda.
Commentaries ICAN Featured ICAN Updates Our Stories Sanam Op-EdsStacey Schamber discusses the potential of US Women, Peace and Security Act to transform the US's role in the world and stresses the need to widen the lens of the WPS policies and the Act to include the domestic US context.
Commentaries ICAN Featured ICAN Updates Our StoriesAn op-ed by Sanam Naraghi Anderlini addressing the Iraq war and the targeting of Iran through the lens of regional geopolitics. "The U.S. should be wary of these [war] whisperers, for while it foots the bill and the world pays for unknowable and uncontainable consequences, others will reap the reward."
Commentaries ICAN Featured ICAN Updates Sanam Op-EdsThalif Deen discusses the reasons behind the dramatic increase in US women legislators voted into office last November and the historic high of women candidates for the 2020 presidential elections, with comments from ICAN's ED Sanam Naraghi Anderlini.
Commentaries ICAN UpdatesBy Monica Makar How lessons learned from Bosnia’s post-conflict reconstruction can be applied to Syria.
Commentaries ICAN Latest ICAN UpdatesBy Rana Allam The Trump admin is releasing $195 million in military aid to Egypt that was previously withheld over human rights concerns. Have these concerns been alleviated over the past year? Or has the Egyptian government’s PR machine garnered results?
Commentaries ICAN Latest ICAN Updates Our StoriesIn the paradoxical battle against military conflicts, is preventive diplomacy one of the political remedies that can help deter wars before they break out? Thalif Deen writes for IPS, with commentary from ICAN's ED Sanam Naraghi Anderlini
Commentaries ICAN Latest ICAN UpdatesBy Sanam Naraghi-Anderlini As the May 12 deadline looms for the US’s endorsement of the JCPOA, world leaders who claimed to support Mr.Guterres’ sustaining peace agenda, have a clear moral imperative: to stand by their words and sustain the peace for the millions of civilians in Iran and beyond who would pay the price if violence escalates.
Commentaries Exclude from RSS Our Stories Sanam Op-Eds